I have recently written about the effects of development in Shanghai, China and argued for and against the various emerging forms of building that are occurring in the region. Local phenomena that spawn from urban developments can be seen across the globe in every city and in varying scales. These occurrences are informed by factors such as, local government policies, cultural norms, the economy, and social forces. Therefore, In order to form judgment on any one locale, it is not only essential to look at what is occurring in other parts of the world, but it is also important to distinguish the cause and effects of the solutions that are implemented. In this post I will be examining an article found in BLDGBLOG by, Geoff Manaugh, entitled “Mathscape”. Manaugh, aside from being the creator of BLDGBLOG, is also the senior editor of Dwell Magazine. In addition to the aforementioned post, I will also be commenting on the post, “Posh to Be Poor: Housing”, that focuses on the future effects of the economic downturn in America. This article, written by Marc Couillais, can be found on Where or by clicking on the corresponding link to either of the above articles (found below).
“Mathscape”
Comment
First and foremost, I would like to say what an interesting project this is and, as well, the ideas and discussions which it evokes. I think it is clear that Project H has an obvious goal in mind with the math playground and after seeing this, I believe that it is successful. Their manifesto states that they are here to “encourage the reorientation of the design industry towards a more socially-impactful and humanitarian entity”, and therefore th
e design of their projects must inherently serve dual-roles. The primary or realistic role (in this case the playground and place to study), and secondly, the role in which you call the “spatial pedagogy”. Your questions of a society in which our environments are geared towards education are interesting when applied to schools and even universities, but unfortunately, I would argue that when put in a situation such as your everyday commute to work they would prove as wasted design efforts. Nevertheless, the fact that we are discussing this is reason enough for Project H to inject such a project. In addition, to further the discussion, I recently read an article by acclaimed architect Lebbeus Woods, titled “Metastructure”. In this, he proposes a fantasy-driven idea towards a defense mechanism for the conflict in Bosnia. This is relevant in that the idea was basically a wall that would serve dual purposes. The fortification would be built as a spatial labyrinth that would separate and slow groups of soldiers to either their death or their eventual inhabitance of the wall. To further the fantasy, Woods goes on to say that the metastructure could eventually become a city in itself as the Bosnian farmers would move closer to supply food and water to the soldiers as a means of economy. Although both of these ideas have dramatically different trajectories, I see them as both being relevant in that no matter how effective they are in their primary roles, their secondary purposes are worth studying in order to achieve a greater design initiative. In this case, one in which conventional architectural elements, such as the wall or classroom, is pushed beyond the realm of typical uses and thus an entirely new entity is created.
“Posh to Be Poor: Housing”
Comment
It would seem that the issues regarding housing and the economic downturn in the United States will never become exhausted; however, it is refreshing to finally see an interesting take on the subject. You have thankfully laid out some intriguing ideas with respect to the current state of the nation and the way in which a designer looks at such issues. We are experiencing a unique era in which innovation is necessary in order to progress past the hardships. Being as bold as Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur suggests in stating that families should “stay put” in their foreclosed homes is a realistic approach to the situation in that she is simply advocating the use of existing resources to house displaced families. Why expend additional energy in relocating families and erecting temporary housing when perfectly good homes are left vacant and unsold? While this approach seems to be the sensible solution, it is the various designers’ ideas that interest me. The Homeless Chateaux, for example, is a fascinating idea that goes beyond the obvio
us use as a minimalist room. To me, the merit in the idea of this “chateaux” is less about how it works and more in how it is used contextually. As James Westwater proposes it to be a room within a room, perhaps there could be a series of these modular Homeless Chateauxs that could than start to inform a greater community. And further, could this begin to suggest a new system of modular living units that could be inserted into a realistic context of perhaps the aging warehouse loft? These units would have to be improved dramatically, but as an idea I find them to be quite interesting and perhaps even hip to the times. Your thought on the gradual migration to the aesthetics of the poor is proof that Westwater’s Chateaux is an idea worth developing. The investigation into the adaptive re-use of everyday items, such as the street sign and pallet used in this project is sure to yield a worthwhile product.
“Mathscape”
Comment
First and foremost, I would like to say what an interesting project this is and, as well, the ideas and discussions which it evokes. I think it is clear that Project H has an obvious goal in mind with the math playground and after seeing this, I believe that it is successful. Their manifesto states that they are here to “encourage the reorientation of the design industry towards a more socially-impactful and humanitarian entity”, and therefore th
e design of their projects must inherently serve dual-roles. The primary or realistic role (in this case the playground and place to study), and secondly, the role in which you call the “spatial pedagogy”. Your questions of a society in which our environments are geared towards education are interesting when applied to schools and even universities, but unfortunately, I would argue that when put in a situation such as your everyday commute to work they would prove as wasted design efforts. Nevertheless, the fact that we are discussing this is reason enough for Project H to inject such a project. In addition, to further the discussion, I recently read an article by acclaimed architect Lebbeus Woods, titled “Metastructure”. In this, he proposes a fantasy-driven idea towards a defense mechanism for the conflict in Bosnia. This is relevant in that the idea was basically a wall that would serve dual purposes. The fortification would be built as a spatial labyrinth that would separate and slow groups of soldiers to either their death or their eventual inhabitance of the wall. To further the fantasy, Woods goes on to say that the metastructure could eventually become a city in itself as the Bosnian farmers would move closer to supply food and water to the soldiers as a means of economy. Although both of these ideas have dramatically different trajectories, I see them as both being relevant in that no matter how effective they are in their primary roles, their secondary purposes are worth studying in order to achieve a greater design initiative. In this case, one in which conventional architectural elements, such as the wall or classroom, is pushed beyond the realm of typical uses and thus an entirely new entity is created.“Posh to Be Poor: Housing”
Comment
It would seem that the issues regarding housing and the economic downturn in the United States will never become exhausted; however, it is refreshing to finally see an interesting take on the subject. You have thankfully laid out some intriguing ideas with respect to the current state of the nation and the way in which a designer looks at such issues. We are experiencing a unique era in which innovation is necessary in order to progress past the hardships. Being as bold as Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur suggests in stating that families should “stay put” in their foreclosed homes is a realistic approach to the situation in that she is simply advocating the use of existing resources to house displaced families. Why expend additional energy in relocating families and erecting temporary housing when perfectly good homes are left vacant and unsold? While this approach seems to be the sensible solution, it is the various designers’ ideas that interest me. The Homeless Chateaux, for example, is a fascinating idea that goes beyond the obvio
us use as a minimalist room. To me, the merit in the idea of this “chateaux” is less about how it works and more in how it is used contextually. As James Westwater proposes it to be a room within a room, perhaps there could be a series of these modular Homeless Chateauxs that could than start to inform a greater community. And further, could this begin to suggest a new system of modular living units that could be inserted into a realistic context of perhaps the aging warehouse loft? These units would have to be improved dramatically, but as an idea I find them to be quite interesting and perhaps even hip to the times. Your thought on the gradual migration to the aesthetics of the poor is proof that Westwater’s Chateaux is an idea worth developing. The investigation into the adaptive re-use of everyday items, such as the street sign and pallet used in this project is sure to yield a worthwhile product.
This post really made me think about architecture in a new light. You chose to comment on two interesting and I think meaningful projects that do not seem to be in the forefront technologically, but rather are influincing architecture in innovative, unique ways. The idea of projects that are not necessarily practical, but rather point in the direction of a solution is one that I had not previously considered. I love the concept in “Posh to Be Poor: Housing” about creating rooms inside rooms to house the displaced. It is such a simple concept, yet the idea that you pose about modular living units seems like a relatively inexpensive and plausible solution. In regards to the “Mathscape” classroom, I thought it was interesting that by embedding tires into the ground the area can be transformed into a more fun and interactive learning environment. It is such an elegant solution, and after following the link to the original article and viewing the pictures of the children of Uganda interacting with the classroom, it seems to me that it works. Also, I am happy you pointed out that while it is an interesting idea to gear society more towards education, it would not work in every aspect that the author suggests. Additionally, I think your use of images is very well done, with both pictures sucessfully illustrating their respective projects, while helping me understand some relatively abstract architectural ideas.
ReplyDeleteMy one suggestion to you would be to explain in a little bit more detail what the “Mathscape” classroom is about. While you made it clear that it is both a classroom and a playground, I left your post wondering how the children interacted with the environment. Is it more focused on educational interaction or simply playing, or is it both? Maybe you could have focused a little more on the content of the articles in your introductory paragraph. I also would have liked a little more clarity about the “Metastructure” concept, although I realize that it was a tangential idea rather than a primary focus. Overall, though, this post was very illuminating and well written.